- PURPOSE.
This advisory circular (AC) is intended to alert pilots to the hazards of
aircraft wake turbulence and recommends related operational procedures.
- CANCELLATION.
AC 90-23D, Aircraft Wake Turbulence, dated 12/15/72.
- INTRODUCTION.
Every aircraft in flight generates a wake. Historically, when pilots
encountered this wake in flight, the disturbance was attributed to "prop
wash." It is known, however, that this disturbance is caused by a pair of
counter rotating vortices trailing from the wing tips. The vortices from
large aircraft pose problems to encountering aircraft. For instance, the
wake of these aircraft can impose rolling moments exceeding the roll
control capability of some aircraft. Further, turbulence generated within
the vortices, if encountered at close range, can damage aircraft
components and equipment and cause personal injuries. The pilot must learn
to envision the location of the vortex wake generated by large aircraft
and adjust his flight path accordingly.
- VORTEX GENERATION.
Lift is generated by the creation of a pressure differential over the wing
surfaces. The lowest pressure occurs over the upper wing surface and the
highest pressure under the wing. This pressure differential triggers the
rollup of the airflow aft of the wing resulting in swirling air masses
trailing downstream of the wingtips. After the rollup is completed, the
wake consists of two counterrotating cylindrical vortices (see figure 1).
Most of the energy is within a few feet of the center of each vortex, but
pilots should avoid a region within about 100 feet of the vortex core.
- VORTEX STRENGTH.
The strength of the vortex is governed by the weight, speed, and shape of
the wing of the generating aircraft. The vortex characteristics of any
given aircraft can also be changed by extension of flaps or other wing
configuring devices. However, as the basic factor is weight, the vortex
strength increases proportionately with increase in aircraft operating
weight. Peak vortex tangential speeds up to almost 300 feet per second
have been recorded. The greatest vortex strength occurs when the
generating aircraft is heavy-clean-slow. Figure 2 shows smoke
visualization of a vortex photographed during early smoke tower fly-by
tests.
- INDUCED ROLL.
- In rare instances, a wake encounter could cause in- flight
structural damage of catastrophic proportions. However, the usual hazard
is associated with induced rolling moments which can exceed the rolling
capability of the encountering aircraft. In flight experiments, aircraft
have been intentionally flown directly up trailing vortex cores of large
aircraft. It was shown that the capability of an aircraft to counteract
the roll imposed by the wake vortex primarily depends on the wing span
and counter-control responsiveness of the encountering aircraft.
- Counter-control is usually effective and induced roll
minimal in cases where the wing span and ailerons of the encountering
aircraft extend beyond the rotational flow field of the vortex. It is
more difficult for aircraft with short wing span (relative to the
generating aircraft) to counter the imposed roll induced by vortex flow.
Pilots of short span aircraft, even of the high performance type, must
be especially alert to vortex encounters. The wake of larger aircraft
requires the respect of all pilots. (See figures 3 and 4.)
- VORTEX BEHAVIOR.
Trailing vortices have certain behavioral characteristics which can help a
pilot visualize the wake location and thereby take avoidance precautions.
-
Vortices
are generated from the moment aircraft leave the ground, since trailing
vortices are a by-product of wing lift. Prior to takeoff or landing,
pilots should note the rotation or touchdown point of the preceding
aircraft. (See figure 5.)
- The vortex circulation is outward, upward and around the
wing tips when viewed from either ahead or behind the aircraft. Tests
with large aircraft have shown that the vortices remain spaced a bit
less than a wing span apart drifting with the wind, at altitudes greater
than a wing span from the ground. In view of this, if persistent vortex
turbulence is encountered, a slight change of altitude and lateral
position (preferably upwind) will provide a flight path clear of the
turbulence.
-
Flight
tests have shown that the vortices from larger (transport category)
aircraft sink at a rate of several hundred feet per minute, slowing
their descent and diminishing in strength with time and distance behind
the generating aircraft. Atmospheric turbulence hastens breakup. Pilots
should fly at or above the preceding aircraft's flightpath, altering
course as necessary to avoid the area behind and below the generating
aircraft. However, vertical separation of 1,000 feet may be considered
safe. (See figure 6.)
- When the vortices of larger aircraft sink close to the
ground (within 100 to 200 feet), they tend to move laterally over the
ground at a speed of 2 or 3 knots. (Figure 7.)
- A crosswind will decrease the lateral movement of the
upwind vortex and increase the movement of the downwind vortex (Figure
8). Thus, a light wind with a cross-runway component of 1 to 5 knots
(depending on conditions) could result in the upwind vortex remaining in
the touchdown zone for a period of time (figure 9) and hasten the drift
of the downwind vortex toward another runway. Similarly, a tailwind
condition can move the vortices of the preceding aircraft forward into
the touchdown zone. The light quartering tailwind requires maximum
caution. Pilots should be alert to large aircraft upwind from their
approach and takeoff flightpaths.
- OPERATIONAL PROBLEM AREAS.
A wake encounter is not necessarily hazardous. It can be one or more jolts
with varying severity depending upon the direction of the encounter,
weight of the generating aircraft, size of the encountering aircraft,
distance from the generating aircraft, and point of vortex encounter. The
probability of induced roll increases when the encountering aircraft's
heading is generally aligned or parallel with the flightpath of the
generating aircraft. Avoid the area below and behind the generating
aircraft, especially at low altitude where even a momentary wake encounter
could be hazardous. Pilots should be particularly alert in calm wind
conditions and situations where the vortices could:
- Remain in the touchdown area.
- Drift from aircraft operating on a nearby runway.
- Sink into takeoff or landing path from a crossing runway.
- Sink into the traffic patterns from other airport
operations.
- Sink into the flight path of VFR flights operating at the
hemispheric altitudes 500 feet below.
- Pilots of all aircraft should visualize the location of the
vortex trail behind large aircraft and use proper vortex avoidance
procedures to achieve safe operation. It is equally important that
pilots of larger aircraft plan or adjust their flight paths to minimize
vortex exposure to other aircraft.
- VORTEX AVOIDANCE PROCEDURES.
Under certain conditions, airport traffic controllers apply procedures for
separating aircraft operating under Instrument Flight Rules. The
controllers will also provide to VFR aircraft, with whom they are in
communication and which in the tower's opinion may be adversely affected
by wake turbulence from a larger aircraft, the position, altitude and
direction of flight of larger aircraft followed by the phrase "caution -
wake turbulence." Whether or not a warning has been given, however, the
pilot is expected to adjust his/her operations and flightpath as necessary
to preclude serious wake encounters. The following vortex avoidance
procedures are recommended for the situation shown:
-
When landing behind a larger aircraft - same runway (figure 10), stay at
or above the large aircraft's final approach flight path -- note
touchdown point -- land beyond it.
- When landing behind a larger aircraft - when parallel
runway is closer than 2,500 feet (figure 11), consider possible vortex
drift onto your runway. If you have visual contact with the larger
aircraft landing on the parallel runway, whenever possible, stay at or
above the large aircraft's final approach flightpath -- note his
touchdown point.
- When landing behind a larger aircraft - crossing runway
(figure 12), cross above the larger aircraft's flightpath.
- When landing behind a departing larger aircraft - same
runway (figure 13), note larger aircraft's rotation point -- land well
prior to rotation point.
- When landing behind a departing larger aircraft - crossing
runway, note larger aircraft's rotation point -- if past the
intersection -- continue the approach -- land prior to the intersection
(figure 14). If larger aircraft rotates prior to the intersection, avoid
flight below the larger aircraft's flightpath. Abandon the approach
unless a landing is ensured well before reaching the intersection
(figure 15).
- When departing behind a larger aircraft: Note larger
aircraft's rotation point -- rotate prior to larger aircraft's rotation
point -- continue climb above the larger aircraft's climb path until
turning clear of his wake (Figure 16). Avoid subsequent headings which
will cross below and behind aircraft (figure 17). Be alert for any
critical takeoff situation which could lead to a vortex encounter.
- Intersection takeoffs - same runway, be alert to adjacent
large aircraft operations particularly upwind of your runway. If
intersection takeoff clearance is received, avoid subsequent heading
which will cross below a larger aircraft's path.
- Departing or landing after a larger aircraft executing a
low missed approach or touch-and-go landing. Because vortices settle and
move laterally near the ground, the vortex hazard may exist along the
runway and in your flight path after a larger aircraft has executed a
low missed approach or a touch-and-go landing, particularly in light
quartering wind conditions. You should assure that an interval of at
least 2 minutes has elapsed before your takeoff or landing.
- En route VFR - (1,000-foot altitude plus 500 feet). Avoid
flight below and behind a larger aircraft's path. If a larger aircraft
is observed above on the same track (meeting or overtaking), adjust your
position laterally, preferably upwind.
- HELICOPTERS.
A hovering helicopter generates a downwash from its main rotor(s) similar
to the "prop wash" of a conventional aircraft. However, in forward flight,
this energy is transformed into a pair of strong, high-speed trailing
vortices similar to wing-tip vortices of larger fixed-wing aircraft.
Pilots should avoid helicopter vortices since helicopter forward flight
airspeeds are often very low which generate exceptionally strong vortices
(figure 18).
- JET ENGINE EXHAUST
.
During ground operations, jet engine blast (thrust stream turbulence) can
cause damage and upsets if encountered at close range. Exhaust velocity
versus distance studies at various thrust levels have shown a need for
light aircraft to maintain an adequate separation during ground operations
(figure 19).
-
Engine exhaust velocities, generated by larger jet aircraft during
ground operations and initial takeoff roll, dictate the desirability of
lighter aircraft awaiting takeoff to hold well back of the runway edge
at the taxiway hold line. Also, it is desirable to align the aircraft to
face any possible jet engine blast effects. Additionally, in the course
of running up engines and taxiing on the ground, pilots of larger
aircraft should consider the effects of their jet blasts on other
aircraft, vehicles, and maintenance and servicing equipment. An
illustration of exhaust velocities behind a typical "wide-body" or jumbo
jet is shown in figure 19.
- The Federal Aviation Administration has established
standards for the location of runway hold lines. For example, runway
intersection hold short lines are established 250 feet from the runway
centerline for precision approach runways served by approach category C
and D aircraft. For runways served by aircraft with wingspans over 171
feet, such as the B-747, taxiway hold lines are 280 feet from the
centerline of precision approach runways. These hold line distances
increases slightly with an increase in field elevation.
- PILOT RESPONSIBILITY.
Government and industry groups are making concerted efforts to minimize or
eliminate the hazards of trailing vortices. However, the flight
disciplines necessary to ensure vortex avoidance during visual operations
must be exercised by the pilot. Vortex visualization and avoidance
procedures should be exercised by the pilot using the same degree of
concern as in collision avoidance since vortex encounters frequently can
be as dangerous as collisions.
- Pilots are reminded that in operations conducted behind all
aircraft, acceptance from Air Traffic Control of traffic information,
instructions to follow an aircraft, or the acceptance of a visual
approach clearance, is an acknowledgment that the pilot will ensure safe
takeoff and landing intervals and accepts the responsibility of
providing his own wake turbulence separation.
- For VFR departures behind heavy aircraft, air traffic
controllers are required to use at least a 2-minute separation interval
unless a pilot has initiated a request to deviate from the 2-minute
interval and has indicated acceptance of responsibility for maneuvering
his aircraft so as to avoid the wake turbulence hazard.
|
Operational Tips for Light Aircraft
How to Avoid Vortex Wake
- Lift Off Short of Large Aircraft Rotation Point.
- Land Well Beyond Large Aircraft Touchdown Point.
- Pass Over Flight Path of Large Aircraft, or At Least
1000' Under.
- Stay to Windward of Large Aircraft Flight Paths.
- Keep Alert, Especially on Calm Days When Vortices
Persist Longest.
|
David S. Potter
Acting Director, Flight Standards Service